My conversation partners are 1) H. Nashabe: A School principal in Lebanon, who is also an AdvancED field consultant and lead evaluator. 2) E. Kazantani: An English teacher in North Greece. Fortunately, these two educators have been so generous with their time, despite their hectic schedule.
Because Mrs. Nashabe works at a high tuition private school, she could not report any direct experience related to poverty. However, she did share her concern that public schools in Lebanon and some of the Arab countries serve less advantaged children and are failing to meet academic and social goals, whereas private schools provide better education; compelling affluent families to choose only private schools to enroll their children in. The reason for this, she explained, is the weak structure and unsystematic policies that govern public schools (H. Nashabe, personal communication, January 20, 2013). This confirms what I have repeatedly noticed, through our readings this week, that schools’ curriculum quality and professional development strategies, accompanied by capable teachers play a major role in supporting disadvantaged children and improving their performance. On a more positive note, she conveyed that occasionally, she obtains scholarships through her community network for gifted students, who are recognized for their distinguished performance on the academic or sportive or artistic level. Yet, she still worried because these children may get frustrated on several occasions; when they are faced with financial challenges and social bigotries from their peers. She stated that this shows “the schism that has been taking place in our society where the poor no matter how excellent they are have no good place in the upper stratum of the society” (H. Nashabe, personal communication, January 20, 2013). This even more underlines the impact of poverty on educational equity.
Because Mrs. Nashabe works at a high tuition private school, she could not report any direct experience related to poverty. However, she did share her concern that public schools in Lebanon and some of the Arab countries serve less advantaged children and are failing to meet academic and social goals, whereas private schools provide better education; compelling affluent families to choose only private schools to enroll their children in. The reason for this, she explained, is the weak structure and unsystematic policies that govern public schools (H. Nashabe, personal communication, January 20, 2013). This confirms what I have repeatedly noticed, through our readings this week, that schools’ curriculum quality and professional development strategies, accompanied by capable teachers play a major role in supporting disadvantaged children and improving their performance. On a more positive note, she conveyed that occasionally, she obtains scholarships through her community network for gifted students, who are recognized for their distinguished performance on the academic or sportive or artistic level. Yet, she still worried because these children may get frustrated on several occasions; when they are faced with financial challenges and social bigotries from their peers. She stated that this shows “the schism that has been taking place in our society where the poor no matter how excellent they are have no good place in the upper stratum of the society” (H. Nashabe, personal communication, January 20, 2013). This even more underlines the impact of poverty on educational equity.